Nosotros recently compared the GeForce RTX 3070 against the Radeon RX 6700 XT in a 50 game head-to-head battle and the GeForce got the improve of the exchanges. Information technology was a shut boxing for the most part, but the RTX 3070 was faster and considering the feature set, it seemed like the style to become, bold pricing is competitive.

Some readers were upset with that comparison though, claiming the 6700 XT was designed to compete with the RTX 3060 Ti, a comparing we were ever going to make anyway.

Technically speaking, the 6700 XT is priced closer to the RTX 3070 based on MSRP. But no demand to lose sleep over that one as today nosotros have another 50 game benchmark comparison the RTX 3060 Ti and 6700 XT, so nosotros can put that debate to residue.

The RTX 3060 Ti is meant to be available for $400 and the RTX 3070 for $500, with the 6700 XT at $480. Actual pricing is higher and all of these GPUs have been priced well over MSRP for the bulk of their existence.

As of writing, the RTX 3070 is closer to $750, while the 6700 XT is down at $600. A 25% toll premium for the Nvidia GPU is steep, and a little hard to justify, even with the aid of DLSS and much improve ray tracing performance.

If anything, that was a favorable matchup for AMD fans who were unhappy with the previous comparing. The RTX 3060 Ti is much more than affordable than the RTX 3070 and slightly less than the 6700 XT at $570.

In a best instance scenario for AMD, the 6700 XT and 3060 Ti occupy the aforementioned price point, and then that existence the case it volition be interesting to meet how they stack up across a massive range of games.

For testing nosotros've used our AMD Ryzen 9 5950X test arrangement with 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 dual-rank, dual-aqueduct memory. Both GPUs were tested at 1080p, 1440p and 4K beyond 50 games, using Windows xi with Resizable Bar enabled, that ways SAM was enabled for the Radeon GPU.

The driver versions used were Radeon Adrenalin 22.iii.1 and GeForce Game Ready Driver 512.fifteen, as these were the latest available drivers when nosotros started testing a week ago.

Let'southward take a look at results for some of the highlight games and then we'll check out how these two GPUs perform across all 50 games in a unmarried comparison graph.

Benchmarks

Starting with Dying Light 2, the Radeon 6700 XT is slightly faster than the RTX 3060 Ti. We're talking almost an viii% margin at 1080p, nine% at 1440p, and 12% at 4K.

Usually we'd await the margin to shrink in Nvidia's favor at the higher resolutions, but that wasn't the case in this game, though absolutely there'southward little difference between an 8% and 12% margin. Strong performance from the 6700 XT, fifty-fifty if information technology didn't blow the 3060 Ti away.

Next we have Full War Warhammer 3, and here the results swing slightly in Nvidia's favor with the RTX 3060 Ti offering 5% more frames at 1080p, eight% more than at 1440p, so 17% more at 4K, though neither GPU provided particularly playable operation at 4K.

If you're after a 60 fps+ experience in this title using the ultra quality settings, then 1080p is the optimal resolution for this class of GPU, though we assume most of yous would melody the quality settings for lx fps at 1440p.

The 6700 XT performs really well in Call of Duty Warzone, pumping out well over 100 fps at 1080p and that made information technology thirteen% faster than the 3060 Ti. The Radeon GPU maintained the atomic number 82 at 1440p and while non a massive difference, you will at times discover the extra thirteen% performance. Once again, neither are ideal for 4K gaming, with under threescore fps on average.

Forza Horizon 5 runs very well on Radeon GPUs, especially with Resizable Bar enabled. The 6700 XT enjoys a potent functioning pb at 1080p and 1440p where it was 16% and 14% faster, respectively, and then at 4K the margins close right up and here the Radeon GPU was just 4% faster, so basically the aforementioned level of performance was seen at this loftier resolution.

The God of War results are very competitive. Here the RTX 3060 Ti was slightly faster at 1080p, then we saw the same functioning at 1440p and 4K.

The 4K results were quite good and it wouldn't take much to ensure frame rates stay above 60 fps on both camps.

Oh, male child, did Far Cry half-dozen stir the pot in our last benchmark. Nosotros mentioned how AMD fans didn't similar us comparing the 6700 XT confronting the RTX 3070, just then Nvidia radicals did non like us enabling the Hard disk texture back in Far Cry half dozen either.

Despite the fact that 6700 XT can deliver over 60 fps at 4K with HD textures enabled, we were told information technology'southward highly unrealistic and we did that to make the GeForce GPU wait bad.

Truth is, we've always tested games that offer HD texture packs with them enabled, specially when testing mid to loftier-stop hardware. This was nothing new and Hard disk textures shouldn't impact performance assuming you have enough VRAM. It's a free visual upgrade and for most gamers well worth using... again, if you have enough VRAM, which you should when spending $500+ on a graphics card.

Those playing Far Cry vi at 1080p or 1440p with either the 6700 XT or RTX 3060 Ti need not worry about VRAM in this championship, fifty-fifty with the Hard disk texture pack, both worked really well despite the Radeon GPU offering upwards to ten% more than performance. At 4K however, information technology does become a trouble for the 3060 Ti as it'south unable to deliver playable performance, while the 6700 XT sailed along without issue cheers to its larger 12GB VRAM buffer.

In our opinion, 12GB VRAM should be the minimum at this toll point. Bizarrely, Nvidia's slower RTX 3060 (the not-Ti version) does pack a 12GB VRAM buffer. Go figure.

Moving on to F1 2021, this game enables ray tracing when using the 'Ultra High' quality preset, and so nosotros've left it enabled as we like to test with presets where possible.

This setting saw both GPUs render 116 fps on average at 1080p, but at 1440p the RTX 3060 Ti edged ahead past an 8% margin and then took a commanding lead at 4K by a 14% margin. Ideally, you'll desire to lower the visual quality settings to heave frame rates, but if you go on ray tracing enabled the GeForce volition reign supreme.

Metro Exodus Enhanced is another championship that enables ray tracing by default. In this particular case, RT hardware support is required to launch the 'Enhanced' version of the game.

This is a bad title for AMD with the RTX 3060 Ti dominating the 6700 XT, offering 27% more performance at 1080p, 31% more at 1440p, so 40% more at 4K, though neither GPU was suitable at this resolution.

Moving on, we have Rainbow 6 Extraction where performance is very like. The 6700 XT was slightly faster at 1080p, and so we see basically identical performance at 1440p, and at 4K the 3060 Ti nudged alee, though performance overall was much the same.

Frame rates in Apex Legends were also similar, though the RTX 3060 Ti did provide the best operation at all tested resolutions. We're but talking about a 4% difference at 1080p and 1440p with a half dozen% margin seen at 4K.

Fortnite's chapter three, season two was recently released and with it a number of operation related issues. That said, the game now appears to be in a pretty good shape, though Radeon owners will desire to make certain they're running the game in the DX12 style as information technology's basically broken using DX11.

Typically, Fortnite gamers will want to opt for medium level quality settings for that competitive advantage, but doing and then for a GPU comparing makes it more than of a CPU benchmark. Also, scaling for Radeon and GeForce GPUs is very similar.

The 6700 XT did provide noticeably improve frame fourth dimension performance with the latest update and this was evident at 1080p. Even at 1440p, the 1% lows were 25% higher using the 6700 XT which is a meaning margin. By the time we reach 4K though whatever and all performance differences were neutralized.

Cyberpunk 2077 is another competitive title for the RTX 3060 Ti and 6700 XT. The Radeon GPU was a whisker faster at 1080p and 1440p, but the margins aren't worth getting excited over. Performance was basically the same as you won't be able to tell the difference between 87 and 91 fps.

Performance Summary

Based on the dozen or then games we just looked at, the RTX 3060 Ti and 6700 XT appear to be very close in terms of performance. In that location were a few titles that did heavily favor ane over the other, only for the nearly part performance was similar.

We did spend a week testing through 50 games, and then let'south go cheque out that data...

Starting with the 1080p expanded benchmark data, we see that the RTX 3060 Ti was simply two% slower on boilerplate across the l games tested. The big wins for Nvidia came in Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds, Warhammer Vermintide two, War Thunder and Resident Evil Village. For AMD, the 6700 XT was most dominant in Sniper Aristocracy 4, Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Horizon Zero Dawn, Borderlands 3, Forza Horizon five, Warzone and The Partitioning two.

Moving to 1440p, nosotros establish a tie between the 6700 XT and RTX 3060 Ti, though that inappreciably ways they delivered the same performance across all titles. Information technology simply signals the margins are counterbalanced out overall.

Of the 50 games tested, the margin was less than 10% in either direction for 39 of them. Then for 22 of the games tested the margin was 5% or less which we deem a tie.

The only outlier was Metro Exodus, the rest of the games were within a 14% margin. For those gaming at 1440p, the 6700 XT and 3060 Ti will deliver a similar experience overall.

For those gaming at 4K, the results are a little more interesting as the RTX 3060 Ti is typically faster unless y'all run out of VRAM. This but happened on a single game we tested though we've too seen this in Ghost Recon Breakpoint, and to an extent Doom using the highest quality settings. Besides Metro Exodus, Nvidia enjoyed solid wins in Vermintide ii, Warhammer 3, PUBG, Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, and Star Wars Jedi Fallen order.

Who Wins?

This comparison is as straightforward as they come. The only advantage the Radeon RX 6700 XT has over the RTX 3060 Ti right now is the larger VRAM buffer, jumping from 8GB to 12GB. This is an advantage that will certainly serve the 6700 XT well in the future, but right at present there are very few instances where VRAM becomes relevant in terms of raw functioning output.

In other words, this is not an issue for the RTX 3060 Ti, and where it might be, the workaround is easy to apply and doesn't impact visuals significantly.

While we'd have preferred the RTX 3060 Ti to pack more VRAM, it's got plenty to get the job done. The advantages of the RTX 3060 Ti include superior ray tracing functioning -- which personally I don't care for too much at this operation tier -- but notwithstanding you can savor RT furnishings if you want, typically at much higher frame rates than you lot'll get with the 6700 XT.

The RTX 3060 Ti also supports DLSS which is a key advantage at the moment. AMD is now hard at work to reduce its significance, simply they've still got some style to become.

It's possible DLSS won't exist a critical feature in a few years, just nosotros never like to heavily weigh our recommendations on what could be, rather we prefer to focus on the hither and now, and right at present DLSS is a strong selling point of GeForce RTX GPUs.

With rasterization operation essentially the same, nosotros don't meet many reasons for buying the 6700 XT over the RTX 3060 Ti, especially when the GeForce GPU costs the same or even a piddling less.

We're all the same tracking GPU pricing closely and our recommendation remains to hold out a little longer before making whatsoever purchase if possible. Merely if yous desire to purchase right now, and have ~$600 to spend, we'd get for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT on Amazon
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 9 5950X on Amazon